Please reply to one of the following options. Be sure to apply at least one ethical system in depth, including application of at least 4 specific aspects of that system in your posts.
Option 1: Present an argument, with research, that the government should stop all spying on anyone who is a confirmed citizen by birth or naturalization.
Option 2: Present an argument, with research, that the government should actively spy on a specific group of people for suspicion of specific actions.
Option 3: Present an argument, with research, that companies like Amazon and Google should continue active surveillance (information gathering) if it is being used to make products and targeted ads more efficient. Be sure to address how they should treat any gathered information.
Option 4: Present an argument, with research, that companies like Amazon and Google should never engage in any sort of surveillance (information gathering) even if that keeps a product inferior for some people and makes finding products and services harder.
How to Solve Please reply to one of the following options. Be sure to apply at least one ethical system in depth, including application of at least 4 specific aspects of that system in your posts. Option 1: Pres Nursing Assignment Help
Introduction:
In this essay, we will be discussing ethical considerations regarding government surveillance and corporate information gathering. We will focus on Option 1, which suggests that the government should stop all spying on anyone who is a confirmed citizen by birth or naturalization. We will apply the ethical system of deontology in our analysis, which focuses on the morality of actions rather than their consequences. Specifically, we will examine the principles of universalizability, respect for persons, and autonomy, and their relevance to the issue of government surveillance.
Answer:
From a deontological perspective, the government should stop all surveillance on confirmed citizens. Firstly, the principle of universalizability directs us to treat all individuals equally as ends in themselves, not merely as means to an end. In other words, we must consider individuals as having inherent worth and dignity, regardless of their citizenship status. Spying on confirmed citizens violates this principle, as it involves treating them as if they were less deserving of privacy and respect than non-citizens.
Secondly, the principle of respect for persons emphasizes the importance of individual liberty and autonomy. Citizens have a right to privacy, and the government must not infringe upon this right without proper justification. The government’s desire for security does not justify intruding on individuals’ privacy, especially since surveillance may not even be an effective tool for preventing terrorism and other security threats.
Finally, the principle of autonomy emphasizes the importance of individuals making their own choices based on their own reasons and values. Government surveillance limits individuals’ freedom to make decisions without interference, as it creates a chilling effect that discourages dissent and freedom of expression. The government must trust its citizens and allow them to make their own decisions without interference.
In conclusion, deontological ethics supports the argument that the government should stop all spying on anyone who is a confirmed citizen by birth or naturalization. The principles of universalizability, respect for persons, and autonomy all highlight the importance of individual privacy and liberty, and the government must respect these values to uphold its moral obligations.
