Your Discussion should be 3-4 paragraphs in length, detailing your thoughts and position using 2-3 readings references for support. Also be sure to pose 1-2 well thought out questions from which your colleagues can formulate a response or generate further discussion.
Scenario: You have just been accepted as an intern at an organization primarily concerned with disease surveillance and prevention efforts. As part of your employment, you are required to learn about and be able to consult with outside officials on a disease of global concern on behalf of the organization. Research and discuss an infectious disease that poses the threat of a pandemic and may require isolation or quarantine efforts. Provide a short overview of the disease including etiology, transmission, and public health characteristics of the disease. Reflect on the social impact of isolation or quarantine should an outbreak or threat of widespread transmission occur. Would there be a question of moral responsibility or do other factors take precedence? What would you personally advise in regard to governments or healthcare organizations imposing mandatory immunization, isolation, or quarantine? How would you personally feel if you were the subject of isolation or quarantine? What would you hope government officials, healthcare professionals, or even your own friends or family do to aid you in this time?
Resources to get you started: Psychosocial impacts of quarantine during disease outbreaks and interventions that may help to relieve strain Attitudes Toward The Use Of Quarantine In A Public Health Emergency In Four Countries http://www.commed.vcu.edu/IntroPH/Communicable_Disease/attitudes2Quarantinehamar06.pdf
In a 2-3 page paper, answer the following questions. In addition to the researched facts you present as your answer, you may provide opinions and real-world experiences where appropriate.
Research and determine a controversial topic, myth, or rumor in the field of infectious disease. One example is a rumor that a full cure for HIV has been developed, yet not distributed to the public. Another example includes the use of a “no nit” policy at schools for students with head lice. In addition, according to a recent WHO report, many people think antibiotics cure the flu and that you should discontinue antibiotics once you feel better.
- State the myth or rumor and why some people believe it. If possible, include specific statistics such as what percent of people may actually believe it.
- What impact does this myth or rumor have on the ability for medical professionals to effectively treat disease? What impact does it have on the patient or public health?Create an awareness campaign to dispel the myth or rumor. What should the message be? What would be the best method to communicate this to the population affected and/or the general public?
The Written Assignment should be 2-3 double spaced pages in length, not including title or reference pages. (No abstract is needed.) Make sure your assignment is APA format with double-spacing, Times New Roman, 12-point font, and 1” margins. Include citations and a list of references in APA format. Edit for spelling and grammar errors. You can get assistance with APA formatting at: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html
Resources to get you started:
Common myths about infections and antibioticsCommon-myths-about-infections-and-antibiotics.pdf
Antibiotic Resistance: Multi-Country Public Awareness Surveyhttp://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/194460/1/9789241509817_eng.pdf?ua=1
Head Lice Information for Schools
How to Solve 1.Feeling Isolated Your Discussion should be 3-4 paragraphs in length, detailing your thoughts and position using 2-3 readings references for support. Also be sure to pose 1-2 well thought out questi Nursing Assignment Help
As a medical professor, it is my responsibility to design and conduct assignments for medical college students. In this task, I have to answer two different questions related to infectious diseases. The first question discusses the social impact of isolation or quarantine during a pandemic. On the other hand, the second question focuses on dispelling myths or rumors related to infectious diseases and their impacts on the ability of medical professionals to treat the disease.
1. Feeling Isolated:
Infectious diseases have been a concern for humankind since ages. In the current scenario, Covid-19 has significantly impacted not only the health of individuals but also the social and economic structure of society. Therefore, understanding the social impact of isolation or quarantine during a pandemic is essential. The disease that poses the threat of a pandemic and may require isolation or quarantine efforts is Measles.
Measles is a highly contagious disease caused by a virus that spreads through the air when affected persons cough or sneeze. It causes a red rash all over the body, fever, and cough. It can lead to severe health complications such as pneumonia and encephalitis, especially among children. Governments worldwide have developed vaccination programs to eradicate the disease’s spread by offering mandatory immunizations to young children. The ethical concerns of isolation or quarantine to control the outbreak of measles are vast.
Isolation or quarantine may increase social isolation and stigmatization, leading to negative psychosocial impacts on an individual’s mental health. Moreover, in some cultures, isolation or quarantine is considered a significant threat to community well-being, leading to non-compliance or distrust of the healthcare system. Government officials and healthcare organizations must look into the moral and ethical aspects of imposing mandatory isolation or quarantine before implementing them. COVID-19 pandemic has also indicated that such situations could cause panic, scarcity of essential goods, and misinformation when it comes to individual and social behavior.
As healthcare professionals, I would advise governments or healthcare organizations to consult with communities and stakeholders before implementing mandatory immunization, isolation, or quarantine measures. Moreover, I believe that providing comprehensive information on the disease and measures to prevent it, combined with other interventions to mitigate the negative impact of isolation or quarantine, can reduce the psychosocial burden on individuals.
If I were subject to isolation or quarantine, I would want government officials and healthcare professionals to provide information and support on the disease and my health care needs. Ideally, my friends and family would extend care to me when needed.
Myths and rumors surrounding infectious diseases often create fear, anxiety, and confusion, leading to negative consequences. One such myth is the belief that antibiotics can cure the flu, and antibiotics should discontinue once you feel better. The impact of such myths can be significant as inappropriate use of antibiotics can lead to antimicrobial resistance, inadequate treatment, and increased healthcare costs.
An awareness campaign to dispel the myth or rumor should target the population widely affected, such as schools, hospitals, and primary healthcare centers. The campaign message should be clear and simple, emphasizing the importance of appropriate use of antibiotics, the difference between bacterial and viral infections and that antibiotics are used for bacterial infections since they don’t work on viruses. The most effective method of communication would be patient education through pamphlets, posters, and videos in the waiting rooms of healthcare settings. The messages can also be disseminated through social media platforms, television, and radio programs.
In conclusion, dispelling myths surrounding infectious diseases is vital to reduce the negative impact of misinformation on public health. The nformation campaigns need to be simple, clear and easy to understand and for the general public not have knowledge in medical science. Communication channels such as social media, print media, and electronic media can be used to disseminate such awareness campaigns.
Degeling, C., Carter, S. M., Rychetnik, L., & Weir, M. (2015). Public Health and Moral Panic: When Reasonable Debate Becomes Capricious Public Opinion. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(4), 423–435. https://doi-org.huaryu.kl.oakland.edu/10.1111/1467-8500.12132